Tom and Emily’s Easter Wedding
Some more photographs from Tom and Emily's gorgeous Easter wedding in York.
A Wedding in the ‘Shire
Anna and Ross were married yesterday in the beautiful grounds of Hardwick House Hotel, Bredon Hardwick in Gloucestershire.
Here are a a few selected photographs from the day.
Camera of Fun at Tom and Emily’s Wedding
Tom and Emily's beautiful York wedding was over the Easter weekend and featured a floral theme of daffodils, expertly prepared by members of the bride and groom's families. These were some of the loveliest floral displays I have seen - although I am biased because I'm a bit of a daffodil fanatic myself. Colourful flower photos to follow!
After the wedding ceremony, dinner, and speeches, we set to work on the photobooth studio a.k.a. the Camera of Fun. See below...
| iPhone version here |
Official wedding photos yet to be released. Guests - watch this space!
Wedding Photography and Copyright
"Can we get the copyright to the photos?"
Let's say you hire a photographer to capture your wedding.
You are keen to know exactly what you are getting, and you want to ensure that you will get the copyright to the photos at the end. Perhaps you have heard that not all photographers will allow this.
Firstly you must understand that no professional wedding photographer will ever hand over the copyright to your photographs.
Instead, most photographers will provide you with a licence that allows specific things to be done with the photographs; for example they may allow you to keep low resolution copies on a DVD and print them for personal use.
Some photographers still prefer not to release digital versions of images - or to release versions with large watermarks that prevent printing by obscuring a large portion of the image - for a variety of reasons. Perhaps the photographer has a more old fashioned revenue model whereby the majority of profit comes from selling prints, alternatively the photographer may have exacting standards for photographic printing that most consumer print services do not allow for.
It is arguable that this practice is changing, and photographers are charging more and more for the photography time rather than prints of the images that are received at the end. In this sense, wedding photography has become more similar to corporate and commercial photography.
However it is also arguable that a photographer operating nearer the higher end of the market wants to maintain full artistic control and will therefore not allow for a situation where couples can make their own prints.
"So we're not Victoria and David Beckham"
Either way, a professional photographer will always retain the copyright - except in extremely rare circumstances.
Of course, it is technically possible for a photographer to hand over the copyright, however this would allow you to sell the photographs for a large sum of money to an agency. Or worse still, put those photographs on Facebook; did you realise that a third party could legally sell those photos onto an agency without your knowledge?
You may be thinking "we aren't exactly Angelina and Brad", but if you think photos of your wedding might not be worth that much, think again. What if the photographer even so much as happens to snap an object quickly from the perfect angle with the perfect light, and there is a company out there who require that exact image for marketing purposes? A professional photographer is defined as someone who makes his/her money from taking photographs, and it therefore denies them the ability to continue making a living when other people get revenue from their works. That's why pros don't do it.
"But wait, these are photos of me!"
Secondly it helps to understand the word copyright and how this differs from intellectual property, licence, and goods.
Copyright doesn't just mean the right to copy a photograph. The word copyright covers a whole host of things by inference: the right to email, publish online, upload to Facebook, sell, print the photograph out, even the right to crop a photograph!
The goods are the photographs themselves, in whatever form they happen to be; this could be on disc, as a download on the photographer's website, in print, in a book.
Intellectual property (IP) is a term that describes the original idea of the work, and because it is unusual for a wedding photography idea to be capitalised on, this is something that is rarely discussed; IP is rarely transferred from one person to another in wedding photography. However it is still worth talking about, because it ties-in with copyright: the IP of a photograph is always owned by the photographer. This means that even if a photograph doesn't have a copyright notice on it, even if it has already been posted online, even if the IP is not protected in any other way (e.g. trademark), the IP by default belongs to the photographer. Even if the photograph is of someone famous, even it was taken by a freelance photographer and sold on to a newspaper, the IP belongs to the person who produced that image, the photographer. As long as there is no explicit transfer of copyright, the copyright will also remain with the photographer, even if a copyright notice is not written anywhere.
"So what does this mean?"
- If your wedding is shot by a professional photographer, intellectual property and copyright almost always remain with the photographer.
- When choosing a wedding photographer, ask what licence to the images they offer. Please respect those photographers who offer no licence at all, as this will be built into their revenue model and they will most likely charge a lot less for your wedding photography.
- Many photographers will assign a licence to the wedding couple that allows them to keep photo files on DVD and print for personal use. A licence needn't be worded in legalese. A licence can be implicit upon an action: this means that if the photographer gives you a DVD with full size images, then you arguably have the licence to keep this DVD.
- A licence is usually specific. Assume that you are not allowed to do anything other than what is written or communicated to you in this licence. Therefore if you are given a licence to store images on DVD, disc, and print for personal use, this means you may not edit, crop, or change those photographs in any way. This would count as transforming or adapting the work. Furthermore you may not email photos or upload photos to Facebook, as this would count as publishing or distribution.
- Some photographers may provide a mechanism to allow for common modern usage. For example, they may provide a heavily watermarked version of the photographs for sharing with guests by email, and uploading to Facebook. Ask your photographer.
Mat Smith is a commercial, portrait, and wedding photographer based in London, UK. The above does not constitute legal advice. Always consult a member of the legal profession. Visit Mat's portfolio here: www.matsmithphotography.com
More Tom and Emily – A York Wedding
So the wedding plans for Tom and Emily's wedding are taking shape and I can't wait for the big day in a couple of weeks. Guests will be asked to have their portraits taken (classic low depth of field 85mm on white), carrying on the theme of Tom and Em's engagement shots so far. Kind of like photo booth meets studio portraits. Naturally, it will be towards the end of the evening, when guests are at their most animated! There may even be the option for guests to actuate the shutter themselves. Fun!
Confetti Keepsakes – a wedding in Marylebone
London Marylebone.
I recently had the great pleasure of photographing Ken and Janice, who tied the knot in London Marylebone after over 15 years together.
A snap decision to make a keepsake from something like confetti is usually a decision well-made.
Tom and Emily’s Engagement – Gap advert styled portraiture
Tom and Emily are to be married next Easter in medieval York, and this weekend we went to take some photos around West London.
Sometimes a shoot is planned in great detail, but sometimes it's nice to see what happens on the day.
Sunday turned out to be freezing cold, so we ventured indoors for these "on white" shots.
South of the River – a beautiful wedding in Petersham Hotel, Richmond by Mat Smith Photography

Claire and Derrick at Petersham Hotel, London
I've just finished editing the photographs of the beautiful wedding of Claire and Derrick in Richmond, London.
The Petersham Hotel has glorious views overlooking the River Thames providing the perfect backdrop for some photographs at early dusk.

Claire and Derrick overlooking Richmond
And here are the happy couple in the hallway inside the Petersham Hotel.

Just Married



















